Pages

Monday, August 10, 2009

Shastri's death: What is the Govt trying to hide?

Even 43 years after Lal Bahadur Shastri’s mysterious death, the needle of suspicion continues to point at various quarters. The decision of the Centre not to declassify documents related to the death, has added intrigue to mystery

M. Gautham Machaiah

The Government of India’s refusal to reveal details pertaining to the sudden and mysterious death of the then Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri at Tashkent in the erstwhile USSR gives rise to suspicion that it has many skeletons in its closet.

The cause of Shastri’s death has been shrouded in mystery for over 43 years, with several conspiracy theories doing the rounds. With the end of the Indo-Pak war in September 1965, Shastri and Pakistan President Ayub Khan signed the Tashkent Declaration on January 10, 1966. Shastri died the next night after he supposedly suffered a heart attack.

One theory is that he was killed by America’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), while some others describe this as a political murder. There have also been several suggestions, all of them unsubstantiated, that Shastri’s successor Indira Gandhi had a role in his death. The Government’s refusal to declassify the papers relating to the death has only added to the intrigue.

Shastri’s family including his wife Lalita Shastri had alleged that he died due to poisoning as his body had turned blue. It is said that the death came soon after he consumed milk allegedly laced with poison.

There are also conflicting reports on whether a post-mortem was conducted on Shastri’s body in the USSR or in India. Now, in a response to a Right to Information (RTI) plea filed by Anuj Dhar, author of CIA’s Eye on South Asia, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) has stated that no post-mortem was conducted in either of the two countries.

However, while admitting that it had one document related to Shastri’s death, the PMO refused to declassify it as it could lead to harming of foreign relations, cause disruption in the country and lead to breach of parliamentary privilege. The Government has also stated that it is in possession of a medical investigation conducted by Shastri’s personal physician.

The people of this country have every right to know what caused the death of their second Prime Minister, and the right step in this direction would be for the Government to declassify the relevant documents.

The Government's cloak and dagger attitude has raised many questions: Did Shastri die a natural death or was it a political murder? If indeed, he died of a heart attack, why is the Government shying away from making the documents public? Was there a foreign hand in his death? Were the Americans, Russians or Pakistanis involved? Did the Congress party play a sinister role in the sordid affair? Many questions, very few answers.

Even in 1966, the Government made no credible efforts to ascertain the exact nature of Shastri’s demise. It is sad that the same apathy continues even to this day.

Thus, the question remains: What is the Government trying to hide?

(Picture sourced from www.thehindu.com)

COMMENTS

Such issues are always shrouded in mystery and intrigue. Take for instance, the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi or John F. Kennedy. Do we need to dwell on these issues? Are they relevant to our times? It is a debatable question. Jai Jawan Jai Kisan.
-Manna Mandanna

Conspiracy theory?
-Sudesh Pai, Bangalore

The people of India have a right to know the truth.
-Manan Desai, Dubai

(This article was also posted on MSN. Some of the responses received are reproduced below)

The reason for the death of our most efficient Prime Minister must be known to us. It is a great effort by the author.
-Saurav Agarwal, New Delhi

Lal Bahadur Shastri was a great statesman and a true leader. Conspiracy or not, we have lost a man who could have rightly pressurised Pakistan into not attacking us again, but after his death we all know what has happened. India not only let go the huge territory it occupied during the war but also remained mum over Pakistan’s propaganda that we had lost. And today we look like real losers.
-Ravi, Hyderabad

There must be something about the document so as not to be made public. All the governments in power in India do know the contents of that document. Why has nobody taken the initiative to make it public? If the classified document has no direct relation to Shastri's death, the government can issue a statement to that effect.
-Bobby Sakariah, Jeddah

I do not agree with the author. Some things are better kept hidden especially since it is not going to change the past. Why screw up the future?
-Bbby, Hydeerabad


People like me have a reason to believe that there may be plenty of skeletons in the cupboards in high places. This is the reason the Government is not coming clear on this issue. Moreover, the country is now ruled by the people of the dynasty which is suspected to have a major role in the death of Lal Bahadur Shastri. It is meaningless to expect this Government to be honest in sensitive issues of this nature.
-Murali Shastry - Chennai

There are lots of skeletons in con(g)men's closet. Will they ever reveal the truth?
-Autar Gurtoo, NOIDA, UP

We do not have any mechanism in the country which works independently. How can we expect such disclosures which can upset the whole system?
-S. Pandey, Allahabad

You have penned your views in a brief but very precise manner.
-R.K. Mehta, Mumbai

The "Dynasty" is hiding facts. This is quite obvious. They have too many things to hide. When they want to possess power, they can go to any extent. Remember the mysterious death of Subhash Chandra Bose. Even to this day, we do not have an answer. We all know what caused his death and who caused it.
-Rohan, Bangalore


This shows that the dirty politics pursued in our country continues even to this day.
-Anuradha, Gurgaon

Is it only the Congress party that has been ruling from the day of the incident and sitting on the classified document? In between other parties too ruled the country. Why did they not let the cat out of the bag? If Indira Gandhi was really behind this, they could have gained political mileage out of it. Thus, theory about her involvement fails.
-TPS, Hyderabad

TPS of Hyderabad, please note that the Congress party has ruled India for 90 per cent of the time. The first non-Congress Government came to power in the late 70s in the form of Morarji Desai, then V P Singh in 1989, followed by people like Chandrashekar, Deve Gowda etc., who were all ex-Congress people, who ruled for a very short time and did not really have any focus on such issues.
The BJP Government did not come to power until the 90s, three decades after Lal Bahadur Shastri's death. By that time other, more pressing and immediate national security issues needed to be handled. Also, just because the Government changes, it does not mean that everybody in the Government changes. It is more than likely that the people guarding the secret of this murder, are those who are affiliated to the Congress party and are in all probability paid or even threatened to keep their silence. Hence, just because there have been a few other coalition Government for a short while, it does not mean that Indira Gandhi was not behind the conspiracy.
-A K Anand, New Delhi

The Nehru-Gandhi families have done good as well as bad to the country. It would be better for the country if this family moves out of politics and gets into social work. Gandhiji has stated way back that the Congress should be dissolved after independence, but it continues to be in existence. Hope they get enough wisdom to move out of politics.
-Sagarika, Pondicherry

The manner in which our Government is dealing with issues like the death of Shastri and Subhash Chandra Bose smacks of Indian involvement, rather than the foreign hand.
-Ankur Priyadarshan, Kolkata

What about the recent deaths of Madhav Rao Scindia, Rajesh Pilot, Pramod Mahajan and others? All of them are mysterious deaths which have not been explained... or have been explained away as accidents... I can attribute all these to only one family.
-Rahul, Bangalore

The Congress party and its leader were the culprits in the "assassination" of Lal Bahadur Shastri, the most patriotic and honest Prime Minister India ever had. These culprits were experts in the art of hushing-up these allegations (facts). The people of this country should open their eyes to the true picture of the leaders of the Congress party.
-Himard , Vishakapatnam

(The views expressed in the Comments section are that of the readers and the author may not subscribe to some of them. For a full compliment of views, please visit: http://content.msn.co.in/MSNContribute/Story.aspx?PageID=0e964653-f101-49ed-af30-276e0d519d31)

5 comments:

Unknown said...

People of India have a right to know the reason , what presently is happening if one reads the history books there is hardly any mention of the freedom fighters and their contribution to make India into a Free country from the British .

Hugh Vas said...

Viewing the global scenario in the early 1960s post II World War, it was a situation where the Communism preached and practiced by USSR was pitched against the Capitalism being professed by the USA. Following the Cuban Crisis where under JF Kennedy’s brinkmanship, the US came the victor and the USSR under Khrushchev became the vanquished. Following this, the US Military was very keen to escalate the war in Vietnam on the pretext of fighting Communism even though that was not a communist country. Meanwhile JFK and Khrushchev came to understanding that there was a need for universal peace. But, this was not to be. JFK was assassinated on 22nd Nov 1962 so that under the bidding of Lyndon Johnson, the US military could immediately advance into Vietnam without hindrance. This changed situation brought a lot of unhappiness to the Politorburo of the USSR and so Khrushchev was ousted in Oct 1964 and replaced by Leonid Brezhnev, before which Jawaharlal Nehru our PM for over 15 years died a disappointed man on the 27th May 1964 following the Chinese invasion. His place was taken by Lal Bahadur Shastri who essentially was a peace loving man. So, after the Indo-Pak war of 1965, LBS was looking for means to 1) veer away from the USSR and 2) settle the Kashmir dispute with Pakistan peacefully. Indira Gandhi, in any case did not like LBS and even more so on coming to know of LBS’s intentions. This disturbed the USSR even more because for them the closeness of India and the unresolved Kashmir dispute were both essential in order to use India as a frontline state to engage in warfare with the USA in the Indian Ocean. So, the signing of the peace agreement between India and Pakistan in Tashkent (in USSR) served as an ideal situation following which, LBS could be eliminated with the greatest of ease. Kosygin was only a front for Brezhnev in the USSR like Chou-en-lei was one for Mao-se-tong in China. Accordingly, presumably with the connivance of Indira Gandhi (daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru) and Kamaraj, the President of the Congress Party this meeting with Ayub Khan of Pakistan was arranged in Tashkent. On the 10th January at 4pm the agreement was signed and the same night at 1.30am LBS was no more - A perfect foil.

Hugh Vas
Mercara Hill Road
Kadri
Mangalore 575 002
Mob: 9972158068

Unknown said...

it was a natural death , it was the hand of pakistan behind his death

Unknown said...

mr. gautam machaiah, it was a pleasure reading your article, you are a very inquisitive person and i appreciate that because i am also like that. i am a fan of yours now.

Unknown said...

mr. gautam machaiah, your article was amazing, you are a very inquisitive person and i appreciate the fact because i too am like that. it was a pleasure reading your article. i am a fan of yours now.